Not really. The DNS responses are cached by XP. Only the first request to resolve a host name requires dns access. I think up to 30ms latency is ok. The overall speed/performance will not be affected.
You can use the following DNSs for testing purposes:
209.208.123.124
209.208.123.125
Due latency, I recommend DNS servers "located" few hops from your computer.
Check hops/latency using command tracert. E.g.
tracert 209.208.123.124
Start -> Setting -> Network and Dial -> Up Connections -> Local Area Connection -> Properties -> Internet Protocol(TCP/IP) -> > Properties -> Use the following DNS Server Addresses
If the problem is just your 2 domains, you can define the host names / IP using the local file "hosts". However I
recommend to use this approach only for a couple of days.
# Copyright (c) 1993-1999 Microsoft Corp.
#
# This is a sample HOSTS file used by Microsoft TCP/IP for Windows.
#
# This...
I have time. English is the problem. :)
If you use Windows 2000/2003, there is a DNS Server right from the box which you can configure as caching-only...
The problem can be reproduced calling http://www.reptilecrazy.co.uk/banner_rotater.asp, as pointed out Yash.
The routine (or an included file) is writing a "c" to output. When a client-side .js writes inline code to output, e.g. "document.x=9;document.y=10", this "c" is concatenated to the...
Checked again using http://www.google.com/language_tools
www.bodymod.org presents problems
bodymod.org is ok
Note: It seems 2 different sites because bodymod.org requires download of an activex and www.bodymod.org not
http://www.dnsstuff.com/ :
bodymod.org points to 64.156.223.167
www.bodymod.org points to 64.156.223.167
however, http://bodymod.org is ok and www.bodymod.org is not
I double checked using http://worldlingo.com/wl/translate