Search results

Wow, what a difference. It's running below 30% usege now and my pages are loading nicely again. Thanks again. riley

Yes, I did see that on the graph. I should have known you guys were already on top of the issue. Thanks Stephen. riley

My sites are on Win14 and I have noticed very poor performance over the past month or so. My pages (.net 1.1) sometimes take up 35 seconds to load. I just looked at the graphs for Win14 on jodopulse and found that the cpu usage is consistently at or near 100%. Any idea what's happening here...

I think we agree on more than you might think. When creating web pages, I use very few, if any, webcontrols. My rules are as follows: if I don?t have to control something?s content from the codebehind, there is no need to use a webcontrol. Otherwise, if I do need a webcontrol, make sure it...

I?m not sure I follow what you?re saying. I never use anything but links for navigation, so spiders don?t have any difficulty indexing the site. I would agree that using buttons tied to postback events for navigation is not a good idea, as the links are not exposed for spiders to follow. But...

Since the change to the forum, I get a 404 error (The page cannot be found)error when I click on the "Mark Forums Read" link. The link's href is http://support.jodohost.com/forumdisplay1.php?%5Bsessionurl%5Ddo=markread riley

I missed your pm -- I don't pay much attention to them... Based on the version of visual studio you are using, the validators will try (when a page is requested from the server) to include support javascript code from a folder within \Inetpub\wwwroot\aspnet_client\system_web. For example...

I would recommend against it. In most circumstances, it produces unwanted results, because the new page inherits the context of the old page. riley

I sense a bit of confusion here regarding the precompiler, or more accurately, confusion regarding 1.1 deployment. For 2.0, Microsoft redesigned the codebehind architecture, resulting in 3 different deployment models: binary-only, partially compiled, and non-compiled. In the non-compiled...

IE is very fussy about whitespace in the code and will interpret it in ways that seem mysterious, although it does make some sense. Anyway, I'm glad you worked it out. Riley

Ok, try this (same concept, different row); move the first anchor tag (a) for the tabs to be to be adjacent to the table data tag (td), as follows: <td height="67" colspan="3" align="right" valign="top"><a href="about.asp"><img src="images/tab_about.gif" alt="About Us" width="130"...

Try moving the closing table data tag (/td) and the closing font tag (/font) to the end of the line with the email address, like this: <strong>Email:</strong> <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a></font></td> </tr> <tr> I suspect ie is generating...

I assume you meant strSQL here, not strConn? I would be very interested in seeing the contents of strConn, as I believe that it is probably missing the dBasePath part when the page fails. Why, I don't know; but that's what I suspect. Put in a response.write for strConn and note its...

Please post the contents of dbasepath.asp riley

Sounds like the key field is defined as a byte (1 byte's max signed value=127). That's the only thing I can think of that might cause such a problem. It that's the case, change the key field's type to something more capable, like a 4 byte integer. riley

Although this is the right direction, you must be very careful here. Dates fields in MS-Access are date/time fields, which means they also store the time. If you update or insert a date field having only provided the date, Access will assume the time is midnight. For example: if you set a...

I think SmtpMail.SmtpServer must be mail.yourdomain.com, but I could be wrong. I have seen many conflicting posts here, some saying to use mail.yourdomain.com and some saying to use localhost. My pages are using mail.yourdomain.com and they seem to be working fine. Try it and see if it works for...

Did you guys just cycle (reboot) win5? I ask because I tried to get to my sites a couple minutes ago (~10:20PM ET) and could not. After looking in the forum for a couple minutes to see if there were any reported problems, I tried my sites again and they worked. riley

Don't worry about the other site. Its database is used for very few things, so if it gets broken, the site will still work fine. But thanks for the offer... riley

The site in question is working fine now; thank you Stephen. I have another site that works the same way, but it seems to have no trouble with its database. I'll have to keep my eye on it, as the psoft script has probably just not gotten to it yet... Thanks again Stephen. riley