Subspace, the latency is going to vary for customers around the world. US customers don’t notice a thing. For international customers, some may notice a slight decrease, some may notice a slight increase. It was the same way when we shifted from PA to Superb. Some customers benefited, some didn’t. But the overal benefit or loss is very small. a ~ 30ms difference isn’t noticible at all
From India, we get a 375ms ping to superb and a 350 ping to acceleratebiz. Our connection is routed through singapore. 350ms is still double what you are getting from the Netherlands. In the US, it would be under 50ms yet when I access our site from the US I see absolutely no difference.
But for MS SQL, it is an issue… the amount of traffic between our web servers and ms sql servers is very large. They have to be on the same network
All I can say is THANK YOU… You guys have done a great job.
I have just changed the connection string and my forum page that was taking 35 seconds to load, is now loading in 1.687 seconds… that is not a mistake, let me say it again - 35 seconds to under 2 seconds.
I think Jodohost need a pat on the back for this one.
[QUOTE=yorri]
I’m sure this is not 100% accurate but it’s better than nothing.
[/QUOTE]
It probably isn’t. For one thing it doesn’t account for actual transfer times and at least part of the script interpretation time. However, since we were discussing load times of MSSQL database heavy sites from different webservers, it was accurate enough.