Do others get this DSPAM error right now?

Customer Support Server/Network Issues
1

I have a couple clients who get this bounce back when they try to email me, am I the only one?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery System < [EMAIL=“<A href=“mailto:[email protected]”][email protected][/EMAIL”>[email protected]"][email protected][/EMAIL]>
Date: Feb 6, 2007 10:34 AM
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: [EMAIL=“<A href="mailto:[email protected]”][email protected]">[email protected]"][email protected] [/EMAIL]
This is the mail system at host dspam1.local.
I’m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It’s attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<[EMAIL=“<A href="mailto:[email protected]”][email protected][/EMAIL">[email protected]"][email protected][/EMAIL]>: host 64.187.103.252[H-SPHERE] said: 558 sorry, that
message size exceeds my databytes limit (#5.3.4) (in reply to MAIL FROM
command)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL=“[email protected]”] [email protected][/EMAIL]
Original-Recipient: rfc822;tim@Trusted Technical Solutions :: Home
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; H-SPHERE
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 558 sorry, that message size exceeds my databytes limit
(#5.3.4)

2

Tim, this seems some bug with Hsphere’s compile of mailserver. They dont easily agree unless we can show them how to replicate the issue. Instead of waiting for them to understand, for now i’ve disabled this check at all. Please let me know how it goes from here.

3

OK – I will keep an eye on it…
I am not sure I understand the problem (maybe I don’t have to…).
We want to have the benefit of the better SPAM filter, but we also need, now, reliable mail service…
Thanks for working hard on it,
Tim

4

I 100% agree about reliability of mailservice. With this gateway we attempted to bring more reliability. The issues popped up only when the antispam gateway went completely into production with quite big load(though it can easily handle), otherwise you may have noticed there were no such issues reported during the trial period which was quite long. I’m going to monitor it for next 5 hours and I apologize for the inconvenience caused.