Just to let you guys know, we have decided to make a major change in our hardware aquisition and have chosen to opt for the Opteron processor line instead of the XEONs.. We have ordered are first batch of Dual Opteron SCSI servers.. You’ll see Web6, Win15, Mail5, MSSQL8 and other upcoming servers as dual opterons now..
configuration:
Dual Opteron 246
4GB of DDR RAM
73GB U320 SCSI Hot-Swap x 3 RAID5
These are an expensive batch of servers. We are using some really nice hardware in them and we expect to be getting better performance out of them then the XEON SATA servers we’ve been using
That’s great news. The Opteron is a magnificent processor, and personally I’ve come to prefer all AMD chips over the Intel. Offering such top-of-the-line equipment should only solidify Jodohost as one of the premiere hosting companies.
the AMD is one thing, these servers offer significant improvements over our older SCSI servers we were using. We have bought nice Seagate U320 hard disks compared to the older U160 disks we purchased 2 years ago..
Also, these AMD servers are dual channel SCSI compared to single channel in the older SCSI versions. That means the 3 disks on the system will share 640mbps compared to 320mbps on the older systems..
We have decided to go all SCSI from now on. We had a brief try with SATA last year (2005). The results were good but we think that the slight gain SCSI gives us in performance will overall benefit us in the long term.. SATA drives use the CPU as a controller, and as a result, they put a significant strain on SATA based database and email servers
So with an eye on further improving performance and reliability, we’ve chosen to adopt this new line of servers.. We over time, plan to upgrade servers with loads on the highish side to the new line
Sounds great. As an ex-AMD employee (for 6 years), I definitely favor AMD’s chips. It’s made it much easier now since they kill Xeons on all benchmarks, especially benchmarks for database transaction and web hosting.
I’m guessing, dual cores aren’t going to be used? What line of servers did you order? I have a lot of experience with HP’s single unit Operton servers and have never had a problem, though I’m guessing you’ve gotten something different (they only hold two harddrives, doesn’t make it possible for raid5).
Yash, I’m on Win5. I am generally happy with the current performance, which in recent months actually seems to be getting better. But, like everyone, I wouldn’t might something slightly faster! Are there any plans to upgrade Win5 or some of the other older servers?