Spam

You really need to upgrade/revise/implement a better anti-spam system.

I’m getting swamped by spam and I’m sure everyone else is also.

There are NEW, technically advanced anti spam systems out there, and I suggest you implement one of them.

These systems rely on blocking messages that come from spammer IP’s. OR, they use spam feedback systems to flag spam messages and not let them go through the mail server.

HSphere anti spam isn’t cutting it!!!

Just ONE example of an email that the PRIMITIVE HSphere system will let through:

You still seeking at getting in to sh ape?
Hope you are b/c I saw these guys,

http://www.kvoe.quiteready.org/wr/

It’s the same stuff you’ve been hearing about in the news that all the
sports players are using.

and he had related export learned
to artifice quiet
have meat third for the clergy and

…X( X( X( X( X( X( X(

…z

Hello,
Do you have an account at gmail who used to have the best spam filter I’d ever seen? Spam gets in(to the tune of 15-40 a day for me now).

We even pay extra on jodohost.com accounts for postini, but spam is even getting through it, spammers change methods, and they get around spam filters very well now, it seems primitive what they are doing, but spam filters don’t work fully because they don’t want to make false-positives.

How does the white/black list work?

I figure my options are:

  1. Delete the email account and get a new one. BIG headache…

  2. Add everybody that I know to my white list, and put

. in the blacklist.

SO, does it pass the white list mail through before it kills the blacklist mail…i.e.everything else???

Thx…z

I know that there no perfect spam filter but I do wonder if there is something wrong with Spamassassin on mail3.

When I look at the headers of recent spam getting through, the Spamassassin score is very low, sometimes 0.1 or even 0! These are mostly weird looking poorly written v.i.a.g.r.a messages.

I run my own Spamassassin on a VPS not at Jodohost. Similar spam hitting that is frequently getting scores of 20. I thought this was caused by Jodo not querying the external block lists but I raised a support ticket and was assured that it does use them, it just doesn’t write it to the headers.

I intend to send some examples to support. Maybe I can catch the same message going through both systems.

Cheers
Ross

the way qmail works, it checks the RBL before even making a connection, it is not handled at the layer than it can write to the headers really.

Some of the RBL checks were disabled across our mail servers because they were generating excessive load slowing performance.

We are upgrading all our mail servers to dual, dual core servers and that should let us re-enable the RBL checks.

Each of our mail servers are handling about 300,000 emails each day.

Yash, the RBL checks are back in place for sometime now :slight_smile:

no, as per Tanmaya.. he had removed additional UniRBL checks that is a database of URL frequently found in spam mails. Just order a large bunch of dual cores

Just as a note to everyone only UniRBL was removed, which is actually a different type of RBL than spamcop, spamhaus, and a few others that we do in fact use.

One pattern I’ve seen with spam recently is that it is sent to multiple addresses on the domain, some of which don’t exist. It would seem to me that a spam filter should be able to easily catch this sort of thing.

I’ve also been seeing a host of messages with the intentionally mispelled viagra subject line, many of which are identical. Once again, these really should be making it into the blocked DB, as they’re identical, obvious spam which has been coming in for weeks.

I have been getting alot of these the last week , i really wish these spammers would get a life, this is making my job very hard… :laser: :croc:

does hsphere, or the emails server software allow execution of command line files? Because spam assassin does well with learning spam, when configured correctly.

Another lovely day of spam. This is absoluty offer today. I am just so fed up with this spam crap and so is my clients…

I will have to turn off mail alerts, pretty bad when you coding and the alerts keeping poping up because of this spam…

X( X( X( X(

[QUOTE=WebDesignSlave]
Another lovely day of spam. This is absoluty offer today. I am just so fed up with this spam crap and so is my clients…

I will have to turn off mail alerts, pretty bad when you coding and the alerts keeping poping up because of this spam…

X( X( X( X(
[/QUOTE]

i know how you feel

Outlook REALLY doesnt help with its pathatically poor anti-spam filter (wait, i forgot, it doesnt have one)

i remember trying Thunderbird (by mozilla.org) that was GREAT for anti-spam, it could learn wot was, and wasnt spam, shame i got a PDA and MS will only let me sync with outlook :der:

but i recommend anyone not tied to outlook to give it a try (note: it doesnt have a calendar and the “plugin” isnt really that great at intergrating it, but it does the job i guess)
if anything, just try moving one email address over at a time.

Outlook 2003 has built in spam (junk mail) filtering and when I used it I found that it worked fairly well on the “aggressive” setting.

I am using Thunderbird these days as I prefer the way it handles IMAP and RSS feeds.

You really should try the free plugin for Outlook for spam filtering by Spambayes. I have been using it for a long time now and can’t imagine not having it.:smiley:

http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/unix.html
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/mac.html

Thanks… :wink:

[QUOTE=manopb]
You really should try the free plugin for Outlook for spam filtering by Spambayes. I have been using it for a long time now and can’t imagine not having it.:smiley:

http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/unix.html
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/mac.html
[/QUOTE]

Has anyone tried this with Outlook Express?

OR

Does anyone know of a great antispam for Outlook Express. Customer has a corporate anti-virus/anti-spyware/firewall, but it doesn’t include anti-spam… and they are committed to Outlook Express as they don’t want to spend money on anything else.

Thanks

[QUOTE=gsaunders]
.. and they are committed to Outlook Express as they don’t want to spend money on anything else.

[/QUOTE]

Thunderbird is very similar in use to Outlook Express, has built-in junk mail filters, and is completely free. I’ve used it for about a year and it’s much better than OE in any respect I can think of.
I only started using the junk mail feature a few days ago, but it does seem to work fairly well.

What about using Thunderbird as a client with its built in Junk filtering — you can always throw a Outlook Express theme on it to make it look like Outlook Express. ( https://addons.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2349/ )

Just a thought, or they can purchase something like SpamFighter http://www.spamfighter.com/